26 August, 2010

Write what you like

Category: writing advice you didn't ask for — Tags: , , – Mike Romard @ 9:02 am

Writing in the 21st Century appears here every Thursday. If you have any questions or feedback, please feel free to leave a comment, or email the author at mromard@gmail.com. This column is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.

Small bit of administrivia before we start: I’m shortening the title of this column because it’s not really a how-to, exactly.

I was watching the special features on the Braveheart DVD that I have, and one of them was about Randall Wallace, the guy who wrote the script for the movie. Now, Braveheart is a flawed movie in many ways, but it’s also one of my favourites. It’s a very exciting, epic adventure story with kick ass fight scenes and it’s genuinely funny in parts (especially in the characters of Hamish and his father, and Stephen the Irish guy). Braveheart has also been attacked for its many historical inaccuracies, which are too numerous to list here, and would detract from the point that I want to make here (but just for fun, here’s an analysis of the first two and a half minutes, with several errors and a minute and a half of opening titles and aerial scenery).

In watching Wallace talk about the script, it’s pretty evident that historical accuracy wasn’t his biggest concern. He wanted to write something that felt true to himself as a story. It seems like any attempt to add historical accuracy only occurred after the script was completed. Wallace has a decent sense of humour about it, pointed out at one point that he was being made fun of for details like having a castle with glass windows.

Now, I’m not going to defend the film’s many inaccuracies. But I would like to point out that, in the end, they didn’t rally matter. Braveheart was a hugely successful film, doing well at the box office and winning several awards. And this happened because Randall Wallace wrote what he wanted to write.

You should do the same. If you want to write, you’re going to enjoy it a lot more if you are writing the stories that you want to write. I don’t care if it’s an historical inaccurate epic adventure, or some slash fan-fiction. If you don’t enjoy what you’re working on, at least a little bit, you’re not going to keep at it.

You may be limited in what you can do with your writing if you take this approach. You might have a hard time getting your work published. In fact, if you’re writing fan fiction, you may not be able to legally publish it at all. Some creators, like Diana Gabaldon get really pissed off at the idea that fan fiction even exists, whether it’s published or not. Others, like Charles Stross, don’t care as long as you aren’t making money from it, and they don’t have to read it.

Go ahead, let yourself write the story that you’ve always wanted to write. Who cares what other people think about it? What you think about it, and whether or not you enjoy writing it, is what really matters anyway.

  • Share/Bookmark
19 August, 2010

How to start writing in the 21st century (part 5)

Category: writing advice you didn't ask for — Tags: , , – Mike Romard @ 8:04 pm

This is part five of an ongoing series of articles to help you start writing. This series will appear every Thursday.

601px-medieval_writing_desk

This week I want to talk about making sure that your characters seem like legitimate people. We’ve all experienced works with characters that are flat or one-dimensional. Those of us who write have probably all written characters that are one-dimensional too. It seems to me that the problem often lies in focusing too much on the protagonist, and not enough on the characters that the protagonist interacts with.

Something to think about, when you’re developing characters, is the Bechdel Test, and whether or not your story could pass it. The Bechdel Test comes to us from a comic strip called Dykes to Watch Out For. In it, a character has three criteria that must be met for her to see a movie. It must:

  1. includes at least two women
  2. who have at least one conversation
  3. about something other than a man or men.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
12 August, 2010

How to start writing in the 21st century (part 4)

Category: writing advice you didn't ask for — Tags: , , – Mike Romard @ 8:32 pm

This is part four of an ongoing series of articles to help you start writing. This series will appear every Thursday.

No dialogue for me, I took a vow of silence.

No dialogue for me, I took a vow of silence.

Eventually your characters are going to have to talk to each other. Well, they usually will, at least. It is possible to have a story without dialogue, but it’s not a common occurrence. Really, unless you set out to write a story without any dialogue (as my fellow Vagabond Jordan Trethewey did a few weeks ago… hey Jordan, why don’t you tell us all about that?), you’re going to use at least a little bit of it.

Good dialogue can be really tricky to write, and I’ve heard it claimed that it’s the hardest thing for new writers to write well. I’m not sure how true that is, because every writer has their own strengths and weaknesses, regardless of how much experience they have.

Personally, I’ve always felt that dialogue was one of my strong points. At any rate, if it isn’t, no one has pointed the fact out to me. So let’s pretend that it definitely is.
(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
5 August, 2010

How to start writing in the 21st century (part 3)

Category: writing advice you didn't ask for — Tags: , , – Mike Romard @ 4:27 pm

This is part three of an ongoing series of articles to help you start writing. This series will appear every Thursday.

Go ahead, describe me!

Go ahead, describe me!

Now that you’ve started to flesh out the ideas for your story, it’s time to focus on your voice.

What do I mean by voice? Well, your voice is what sets you apart from other writers. Voice is your tone and your style. Think about the last time that you had to read a memo at work, or a form letter from a business. Now think about the last time that you read an email message from a friend. Other than the messages themselves, what is different about these things? Chances are, the memo or business letter would have been written with more formal and neutral language than the email was (unless you work in a really casual office, or if you have really boring friends).

So how do you establish your voice as a writer?
(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark